Description
CHAPTER 2
CASE Questions
- What is a declaratory action? What does it mean to enjoin? What is an injunction?
- What is the court’s definition of the unauthorized practice of law?
- What activities did the defendant engage in that were arguably UPL?
- What is the court’s reason for not allowing the defendant to have her computer-generated legal forms business?
- After reading this case, can you answer the “Hypothetical” posed at the beginning of this chapter?
CASE Questions
- According to the court, what is the unauthorized practice of law?
- What are Roosevelt and Boulevard, and what was Pearlman’s association with them?
- What was Pearlman doing that the Cleveland Bar Association argued constituted the unauthorized practice of law?
- This court has held that there are some exceptions to the UPL law. What are they?
- Corporations can’t practice law by themselves. They need to have a person represent them. What things can a layperson do on behalf of a corporation according to this Ohio court?
- Ultimately, what does this court decide?
CASE Questions
- Why was Rosemary Furman tried again?
- Who is the “watch dog” in this case?
- Furman argued that the court’s earlier order was “vague.” What do you see in the order that is vague?
- Furman wants to reargue whether her actions constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Why does the court say it will not allow that argument?
- The court said, “Of the sixteen alleged instances of unauthorized practices of law, four were nolle prossed by the Bar.” What does nolle prossed mean?
- What were the consequences for Rosemary Furman?
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.